I spent only 3 days studying marketing, and i got wat i deserved.
Before the exam I would have setted for 45-50 marks from the amount of effort i put in for revision - 3 days.
I managed to spot most of the question in today's paper. I studied 7 out of 12 topics and i am able to do 5 out of 8 of the qns. I was only required to do 4. I was so happy.
i did risk, PLC, qn6 and wanted to do the qn on ansoff matrix. the word is wanted.
i'm not sure y, i spent damn long on each qn. spent an hour on each qn. Everytime i try to go faster, i still end up finishing the qn in 1hr. My potential for this paper was probably 60 marks. but due to my dismal time keeping, I guess i will end up with a 40 something marks. 40 something might be a hopeful mark for only 3 qns attempted.
I nv learn my lesson from IBM last year. last year in ibm, i spend 15 mins to complete the last qn. I ended up with 48 marks i think.
Last year in sociology, I spend so long to do section B that i didn't had time to do section C globalisation. in a highly publicised event, the section c was cancelled because they forget to print the qn. In a way i was lucky last year.
by the way qn 6 traditional advertising is about STP or breaking through the clutter? can someone advise. if it's about STP maybe i might end up with 30 something :(
i would have accepted a low mark due to my lack of knowledge, but poor time keeping is a bit hard to swallow.
can someone cheer me up